[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:38:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200209071732.g87HW5g0000485@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: epp via smtp

At 01:32 PM 9/7/2002 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
> > the operative part of the question was the word "convert".
>
>I can't help you on matters of faith.

Then it's a good thing this was about your clarifying what you meant, 
rather than any sort of matter of faith, on the theory that you used the 
word "convert" to refer to something technical.

To refresh your memory, you said:

>What it really does is convert SMTP sessions (optionally containing EPP
>messages) to/from (optionally) EPP messages?


So the question is what you mean by "covert smtp session"?  What does it 
mean to convert an smtp session to/from an application message?

d/

----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850


Home | Date list | Subject list