Re: Service Message Format

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>]

I think "allow" but not "force" would be good.
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: Service Message Format


> Something Hong mentioned in one of his recent notes got me thinking about
> service messages (the kind that can be retrieved using the <poll> command)
> and how their format is currently (un)specified.  The current specs use
the
> XML Schema "normalizedString" type for the <msg> element; this allows for
> text messages, but no additional XML.  I was wondering if folks might find
> it useful to allow XML in the <msg> element so that it would be possible
for
> a server operator to define parsable message structures.
>
> -Scott-
>