To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:34:04 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: They're already calling for 53rd IETF Meetings
> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:lewis@tislabs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine > Cc: Edward Lewis; ietf-provreg@cafax.se; brunner@nic-naa.net > Subject: Re: They're already calling for 53rd IETF Meetings > > > At 7:37 PM -0500 1/17/02, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland > Maine wrote: > >In my opinion, a time slot in Minneapolis would be time well spent. > > Does anyone else feel the need for a meeting? I am not > disputing Eric's > reasons, but I'd like to hear from a wider set of people. > > Are folks holding off a decision until they see new (already promised) > drafts and/or versions? I intend to send the updated documents to the I-D administrator some time tomorrow. Assuming no one finds that I did anything stupid or counter to what we've covered in the last call, I believe that the documents are ready to be sent to the IESG. It would be nice if they could be last-called by the IESG prior to the March meeting, and if that happens we might have some additional topics for discussion. I'd prefer to see a more thorough description of Eric's suggested topics sent to the mailing list before rendering an opinion on their suitability as agenda items. We might be able to have a more thoughtful discussion if we have something to look at ahead of time. Anyway, it sounds like it might be wise to reserve a meeting slot just to be on the safe side. -Scott-