[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:34:04 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: They're already calling for 53rd IETF Meetings

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:lewis@tislabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:56 PM
> To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
> Cc: Edward Lewis; ietf-provreg@cafax.se; brunner@nic-naa.net
> Subject: Re: They're already calling for 53rd IETF Meetings
> 
> 
> At 7:37 PM -0500 1/17/02, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland 
> Maine wrote:
> >In my opinion, a time slot in Minneapolis would be time well spent.
> 
> Does anyone else feel the need for a meeting?  I am not 
> disputing Eric's
> reasons, but I'd like to hear from a wider set of people.
> 
> Are folks holding off a decision until they see new (already promised)
> drafts and/or versions?

I intend to send the updated documents to the I-D administrator some time
tomorrow.  Assuming no one finds that I did anything stupid or counter to
what we've covered in the last call, I believe that the documents are ready
to be sent to the IESG.  It would be nice if they could be last-called by
the IESG prior to the March meeting, and if that happens we might have some
additional topics for discussion.

I'd prefer to see a more thorough description of Eric's suggested topics
sent to the mailing list before rendering an opinion on their suitability as
agenda items.  We might be able to have a more thoughtful discussion if we
have something to look at ahead of time.

Anyway, it sounds like it might be wise to reserve a meeting slot just to be
on the safe side.

-Scott-

Home | Date list | Subject list