Re: <poll> and object changes (was authInfo in <info> commands)

[Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>]

yes, well it seems that I've become a broken record...

http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-12/msg00041.html

sorry for the repeating.

Dan

Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

>Dan,
>
>Text describing the notification needs you mentioned below is going into the
>next version of the documents.
>
>-Scott-
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Daniel Manley [mailto:dmanley@tucows.com]
>>Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:53 PM
>>To: Ed Rahn
>>Cc: asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
>>Subject: <poll> and object changes (was authInfo in <info> commands)
>>
>>
>>It's my philosophy (and perhaps this should go into the 
>>drafts) that an 
>>EPP registry should/must create a notification to sponsoring 
>>client of 
>>an object when that object is modified without that client's direct 
>>involvement.  So a domain registrar, for example, would be 
>>notified of 
>>changes in the status of a transfer initiated by the other 
>>registrar or 
>>by the registry's auto-approve/deny mechanisms.  Actually, the 
>>requesting registrar should also be notified if the transfer 
>>is denied 
>>by the losing registrar or auto-denied/approved by the registry.
>>
>>Other situations where a registry would notify a registrar of 
>>changes to 
>>objects it owns:  auto-renewals, object (domain) expiry, changes 
>>initiated by the registry's support staff, etc...
>>
>>this way, the owning registrar (with regular polling, or with 
>>pushing) 
>>can count on always being in the know of changes to its 
>>objects in the 
>>registry.
>>
>>Dan
>>