To:
"'Rick H Wesson'" <wessorh@ar.com>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:37:31 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: <info> Command and authInfo
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:24 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se' > Subject: Re: <info> Command and authInfo > > > > please don't turn this spec into VeriSigns view of a Domain Registry. Up > till now you have done a good job of engineering but it seems as though > your employer is creeping into your work. Rick, I really object to any insinuation that there's any employer bias creeping into anything here. My comments on RRP were provided to document experience with a similar protocol. Data mining is a real issue, and the current EPP spec has said for a LONG time about the way the info command should be implemented -- and it's NOT what you suggested ("the status command should be open to all registrars"). Instead of an ad-hominem attack, why not address the data mining risk and merit or detriment of the change proposal? -Scott-