To:
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 05:27:38 -0800
In-Reply-To:
Message from Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> of "Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:43 PST." <5.1.0.14.2.20020110103626.032e1008@127.0.0.1>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Minutes from SLC
Dave, The sense of the meeting (London) was that <push>, when removed from the XRP draft (like transport over BEEP), would be a WG draft. When Ed took the question to the WG (the list), there was no consensus to accept a WG draft containing <push>. I'm just fishing for the end of a wait statement, and I didn't see it in the SLC minutes. Eric