To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@bullhead.nic-naa.net
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:28:33 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<200201101018.g0AAIFq04686@bullhead.nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Minutes from SLC
The WG is open to discussion of <push>. I think that the ground work is already in place to have this enter as a WG document, given the discussion to date. If there is an issue over "control," I think we should "burn that bridge when we come to it" as an ex-officemate used to say. At 5:18 AM -0500 1/10/02, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >Ed, > >I'm still waiting on the-sense-of-the-wg on the question that came up on >the list post-London: what shall we do with <push>? > >The choices are: > > - a draft under wg change control, > - a draft outside of the wg > >I'm fine with either approach. > >Eric -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.