To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <email@example.com>
Cc: Edward Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Edward Lewis <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:28:33 -0500
Subject: Re: Minutes from SLC
The WG is open to discussion of <push>. I think that the ground work is already in place to have this enter as a WG document, given the discussion to date. If there is an issue over "control," I think we should "burn that bridge when we come to it" as an ex-officemate used to say. At 5:18 AM -0500 1/10/02, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >Ed, > >I'm still waiting on the-sense-of-the-wg on the question that came up on >the list post-London: what shall we do with <push>? > >The choices are: > > - a draft under wg change control, > - a draft outside of the wg > >I'm fine with either approach. > >Eric -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.