To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
lewis@tislabs.com, jaap@sidn.nl
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:15:32 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
preparing for Salt Lake City (part 1)
I've submitted a request for a time slot at the meetings coming up in Salt Lake City. I have asked for a two hour slot, but wonder if perhaps we can get by with a one hour slot. The current state of the WG is: the requirements document has been returned to the IESG and is awaiting action, recent updating of most of the WG EPP drafts, and discussions of largely detailed nature on the list - with the list being mostly quite in recent weeks. Based on this, it seems that we don't really need a second hour. Does anyone have a reason to believe that we need a two hour meeting (as opposed to a one hour meeting)? Sooner or later we will being to address an agenda for the meeting. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial. Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.