Re: "opt-in" schema

["Pindar Wong" <pindar@hk.super.net>]

If this group doesn't mind, I'll put together something over this long
weekend in Hong Kong, so that we've got something that we can work through
to identify the major issues (e.g. atomicity of what is being
opted-in-to/out-of).

I'll be using an example of using EPP to create a domain name registrant
membership registry that contains the social information identifiers
gathered from the registrars.

Cheers,

p.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'Paul M. Kane'" <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: "opt-in" schema


> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@REACTO.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:05 AM
> >To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> >Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott
> >Subject: "opt-in" schema
> >
> >
> >Does the latest version contain parameters for passing from the
> >registrant, via the registrar, to the registry, or other parties,
explicit
> >consent flags?
>
> No, there's nothing defined yet or currently planned for -05 because no
> proposal has been offered that:
>
> - Describes what is being opted-in-to or -out-of.
>
> - Identifies the specific elements that should be subject to opt-*
> considerations.
>
> - Describes how a server should process opt-* requests.
>
> If someone would put together a proposal we would have something to
> consider.
>
> <Scott/>
>