RE: EPP E.164 Number Mapping

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

Thanks for the comments, James, I'll work fixes into the next iteration.  I
doubt we should continue to talk about this draft on the provreg list,
though, since it's an individual submission and not a provreg work item.  If
either of the chairs disagree with me, I'm sure they'll speak up.

<Scott/> 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yu, James [mailto:james.yu@NeuStar.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: 'Hollenbeck, Scott'
> Cc: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
> Subject: EPP E.164 Number Mapping
> 
> 
> Scott,
> 
> Two comments on the I-D:
> 
> - Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2, first dashed item:
>   <e164:name> is mentioned; however, <e164:dn> is used in the example.
> 
> - Section 2.2.6 Replacement:
>   Replacement field should be added.  There are cases when 
> the "flags" field
> is empty, the Fully Qualified Domain Name in the replacement 
> field is used
> to retrieve the NAPTR RRs next.
> 
> James  
>