[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc: "'Peter Mott'" <peter.mott@2day.com>, Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D750A20@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Reply-To: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: VeriSign Patents on Registries/Registrars and other readings


> There is no bad faith at work here at all.  If you took the time to read the
> applications, you would find that they refer to work originally performed
> 2-3 years ago related to the current NSI SRS, or they are registrar business
> mechanisms, all of which WAS done "in-house entirely with their own clue".
> They have NOTHING to do with ANY of the work being performed in this WG.

Is VRSN willing to issue an irrevocable waiver, enforceable by anyone, of
any coverage of these patents, worldwide, beyond *the* SRS?

		--karl--




Home | Date list | Subject list