To:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Peter Eisenhauer <eisenhauer@schlund.de>
Date:
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:55:52 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200104061343.f36DhnW01136@zed.isi.edu>; from bmanning@ISI.EDU on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:43:49AM -0700
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.3.12i
Subject:
Re: Nameserver MUST HAVE IP
There is no need to register *all* name servers with ip addresses. e.g. think of a registry for .tld with 2 Domains: foo.tld with name servers ns1.foo.tld and ns2.foo.tld -- these name servers MUST be registered with ip addresses in the registry. bar.tld with nameservers ns3.foo.tld, ns4.foo.tld -- there is no need that the ip addresses of these name servers must be in the *registry*. In this model ip addresses for name servers in the registry are only needed for "real" glue records. On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:43:49AM -0700, Bill Manning wrote: > % > % draft-ietf-provreg-grrp-reqs-01.txt: > % "Name servers registered within the registry's authoritative TLDs MUST > % be registered with a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address." > % > % I think this should be registry policy, not protocol requirement. > % There are models in which IPs are not needed for *all* name servers inside the > % registry. The "MUST" excludes these solutions. > % > > I am intriged. Please elaborate one model where an IP is not needed for a > nameserver. > > -- > --bill Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Peter Eisenhauer -- Peter Eisenhauer Schlund + Partner AG Erbprinzenstrasse 4-12 Tel: 0721/91374-0 76133 Karlsruhe E-Mail: eisenhauer@schlund.de