[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Sheer El-Showk <sheer@saraf.com>
cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 23:04:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:36:13 EST." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103231611290.8084-100000@laudanum.saraf.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Design teams

Sheer,

You may want to look at rfc2140 if the foundations for the motivation for
the change in connection management in http interest you.

> which is generally the case in registry-registrar.  But as a _generic_
> registration protocol, whose to say I might not allow hundreds of
> different clients to connection from different locations (without going
> through some front end registrar).  In this case the overhead of BEEP and

You may want to discuss this with James Seng, who has previously written to
a similar effect (access models without interposition by a registrar). IMO
there are some issues to be resolved when removal of the registrar agency
is proposed, but your milage may vary.

Cheers,
Eric

Home | Date list | Subject list