To:
"Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Cc:
"Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>, "Peter Chow" <peter@interq.or.jp>, "Zhu Yu" <yu.zhu@i-dns.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:49:52 -0600
Importance:
Normal
In-Reply-To:
<a0501040cb6def3987a80@[135.222.68.76]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Design teams
| Also, if done right, these connections should generally be fairly | long-lived (lots of transactions per connection). Setup time becomes | a rather small drop in the bucket if these connections are staying up | for a while. This is what I was thinking as well. A particular implementation might open several connections to a given peer and use those in a similar manner to pooled database connections. -bws