[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: <ietf-whois@imc.org>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "William Tan" <william.tan@i-dns.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 03:45:15 +0800
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Signed response

The PKIX WG has a Online Cert Status Protocol (OCSP) proposal where
the CA runs a service like this answering queries about the status of issued
certificates,
signing the responses.

The concept of signed response by the CA (in this case, registry /
registrar) may be
an important requirement for whois and status request on provreg.  The
reasons are:

1. Result of whois & status queries have been used by lawyers as evidence in
court of law
2. Authenticity of content - client can verify the integrity of the answer
(important data to sign
would be 'Database-updated-date', the query result, or
'No-such-record-at-this-time').

Maybe we should consider this part of the requirement.

wil.


Home | Date list | Subject list