To:
"Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, "Patrik Faltstrom" <paf@cisco.com>, <brunner@nic-naa.net>
From:
"James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:34:52 +0800
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: APRICOT'2001
> Your contribution to the requirements statements appear to be: > > 1. differences in policy, management, and business models exist. I don't have contribution to the requirements doc. My company have a registry but I am not involved in that part of it anymore. But my opinion is that Asian NICs should put their requirements to the table themselves. So what I am doing is informing them about the presence of this group. And I am feedbacking their response to this group. > 2. a useless work-product will not be adopted. And your XPR is? I don't think a 112 page I-D is something what I call easy to understand, especially for those whose native language is not English. I could not even be bother to give comment on it. > Is that the best that can be done when the APRICOT best-and-brightest are > in one room? Your continual sacarism against me indirectly is only getting silly. "Please continue to act like an idiot", really, please continue to do so. But I am saying too much. I am going to keep quiet until I get my proposal into this group. -James Seng