To:
shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck, Scott)
Cc:
bmanning@isi.edu ('Bill Manning'), ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:46:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75064C@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com> from "Hollenbeck, Scott" at Feb 16, 2001 10:32:06 AM
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3]
Yup. I re-read it. I'm concerned that depending on venue, the level of information required changes. DNS baseline vs DNS-TSIG, vs DNS-SIG/KEY not counting the goofy CERT rr injections for PGP/SSH key distribution will all change the amount of data that will need to be maintained. % % Bill, % % Have a read of the definitions section ("Thick Registry" specifically), % where it describes "technical information" as "information needed to produce % zone files". % % <Scott/> % % -----Original Message----- % From: Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@ISI.EDU] % Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:27 AM % To: shollenbeck@verisign.com % Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se % Subject: Re: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3] % % % % % % Eric, % % % % The intention of requirement 11-[3] isn't to document that "a mechanism % % exists to to distinguish technical from social information", it's intended % % to note that disclosure of non-technical information may be subject to % % restrictions and the protocol needs to provide a way to identify % information % % that is subject to disclosure restrictions. This was added at the request % % of Karl Auerbach. % % What is the distinction between "technical" and "non-technical"? % Are these definitions immutatble within/between juristictions? % Will they withstand legal review? % In which venues? % % --bill % -- --bill