To:
shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck, Scott)
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:26:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D750646@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com> from "Hollenbeck, Scott" at Feb 16, 2001 08:51:49 AM
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3]
% % Eric, % % The intention of requirement 11-[3] isn't to document that "a mechanism % exists to to distinguish technical from social information", it's intended % to note that disclosure of non-technical information may be subject to % restrictions and the protocol needs to provide a way to identify information % that is subject to disclosure restrictions. This was added at the request % of Karl Auerbach. What is the distinction between "technical" and "non-technical"? Are these definitions immutatble within/between juristictions? Will they withstand legal review? In which venues? --bill