[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: shollenbeck@verisign.com
cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:50:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3]

Scott,

Elsewhere we've established the division between technical and social
information (zone files vs billing files).

We can be specific about the minimum necessary data collection and
onward-transport policies for technical data.

We can be specific about the minimum necessary data collection and
onward-transport policies for social data,  

What your [3] manages is simply to assert a mechanism exists to to
distinguish technical from social information.

I propose that [3] be removed from Section 11, and a section added
with the requirements statements attempted in [3] revised and placed
in this new section.

1x. Data Collection Considerations

  [1] The protocol MUST allow each data transfer to include aggregations of
  information identifying the parties exchanging data, information about the
  jurisdiction of each party, and the data collection policies applicable to
  different pieces of data in the exchange.

  [2] The protocol MUST allow aggregations of specific policy characteristics
  that describe how data can be used, how long data can be retained, who may
  be a recipient of the data, and the data access available to the data's
  originator.

This will allow a "record route" like feature for onward transport after
initial information collection, "signed" jurisdictionally and for business
practices for technical and social information [1],

and

This will allow object-specific expression of applicable data collection
policies (purpose/recipient/retention/access) [2].

Cheers,
Eric

Home | Date list | Subject list