To:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
CC:
<ietf-whois@imc.org>
From:
budi@alliance.globalnetlink.com
Date:
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 06:22:39 +0700
In-reply-to:
<003701c086f6$46260ef0$32272dd4@jamessonyvaio>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Merging RRP and Whois
> And IMHO, there is no technical reason to forbid a registrant to access > the registry directly, should certain policy or technical reqirement > needs it. I am not saying the registry SHOULD (or MUST) do this, but > that they MAY. Agree. Why can't we simplify the requirement, ie. the system (protocol/implementation) should only allow *one* entity to access (read/write/update) to a record? This *one* entity could be registrar, reseller, registrant, registry, whatever. As long it is *one* entity. (That way it can accomodate any business model.) -- budi -- Homepage: <http://budi.insan.co.id> my presentation materials, papers, scrapbook, ... and more What's your "web.id"? Register your web.id @ http://www.idnic.net.id