To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 06:59:48 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Moving ahead
I'll have an individual submission update sent to the I-D administrator later today. <Scott/> > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:lewis@tislabs.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:25 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: RE: Moving ahead > > > If you feel it is time for a new version, do it as an individual > submission. I've heard nothing on the state of the charter > (positive or > negative). I had been expecting something by two days ago. > That and my > being tied up the last few days on something kept me from replying. > > My guess is that the WG status won't be discussed for at > least a week, so > let's count on doing more pre-WG activity. > > As far as an in person meeting, I will see what kind of > meeting(s) will not > cause heart burn. I'll have something tomorrow. > > At 1:44 PM -0500 1/18/01, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >I've been awaiting guidance from our (proposed) chairs > related to submitting > >an updated requirements draft as an individual submission or > as a WG draft > >before moving forward. If we're still in limbo regarding WG > status, perhaps > >doing another individual submission is the way to go. > > > ><Scott/> > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Paul George [mailto:pgeorge@saraf.com] > >Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:37 AM > >To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > >Subject: Moving ahead > > > > > >Seems the group is very quiet. :-) > > > >Scott, perhaps now is a good time to share the latest > revision with the > >mailing list so we can all say yea or nay?? > > > >Paul George > >SARAF Software Solutions > >(703)538-5666 x234 > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis NAI Labs > Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com > > Dilbert is an optimist. > > Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer. >