RE: Charter last call summary

["Paul George" <pgeorge@saraf.com>]

I agree with the charter.

Paul George
SARAF Software Solutions
(703)538-5666 x234


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]On
Behalf Of Edward Lewis
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 11:01 AM
To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc: lewis@tislabs.com
Subject: Charter last call summary


This is the charter I am preparing to send "upwards" real soon now.  This
incorporates the comments I have seen on the list.
============================================================================

Provisioning Registry Protocol (ProvReg)
------------------------------

  CHAIR(S):
         Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
         Jaap Akkerhius <jaap@sidn.nl>

  APPLICATIONS AREA DIRECTOR(S):
         Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
         Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@innosoft.com>

  AREA ADVISOR:
         Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>

  MAILING LISTS:
  General Discussion: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
  To Subscribe: majordomo@cafax.se
    In Body: subscribe ietf-provreg
  Archive: http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/

DESCRIPTION OF WORKING GROUP:

Administration of Domain Name Service (DNS) registration increasingly
distinguishes between the operation of a "back-end" registry data base
service for registrations, versus "front-end" support services by
registrars who interact with registrants and with the registry.  Especially
for various Top-Level Domains, the desire is to permit multiple registrars
to share access to the data base.  Conversely, there is a desire to allow a
registrar to access multiple registries via the same protocol, even if the
registries differ in operational models.

This working group will develop a specification of the requirements and
limitations for a protocol that enables a registrar to access multiple
registries and will develop a  protocol that satisfies those requirements.
The protocol will permit interaction between a registrar's own application
and registry applications.

The initial specification will allow multiple registrars to register and
maintain domain names within multiple Top Level Domains (TLDs). The
specification should be flexible enough to support the different operational
models of registries.  The specification should allow extension to support
other registration data, such as address allocation and contact information.

The working group will use as input the "Generic Registry-Registrar
Protocol Requirements" <draft-hollenbeck-grrp-reqs-05.txt> and the
Extensible Provisioning Protocol presentation, documented in
<draft-hollenbeck-epp-00.txt>.

The group will consider support for multiple operational choices, such as
for transport and security; it will create no new transport or security
protocols.  The group may consider use of the new protocol for diverse
registration and update scenarios, in order to understand limitations and
possible extensions that are appropriate.  Specification for user interface
access, such as by a web front end, is beyond the scope of this working
group.

Documentation from the working group will:

*       Specify the objects exchanged between the registry repository and
registrars, the relationships among the objects, and the protocol for
exchanging objects between a registrar and the registry; at a minimum the
objects will include:  domain name, IP address, and contact details for
registrants

*       Describe appropriate mechanisms for security during registrar access

*       List useful examples of registrar access transactions

GOALS AND MILESTONES:
Jan, 2001       WG charter

Feb, 2001       Working group agreement on functional requirements for
protocol

Apr, 2001       Initial specification of provreg protocol

Jun, 2001       Second draft specification

Sep, 2001       Submit draft for standards track

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com

Dilbert is an optimist.

Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.