To:
DNSSEC <dnssec@cafax.se>
From:
Dan Massey <masseyd@isi.edu>
Date:
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:37:43 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Delivery-Date:
Tue Aug 14 11:53:05 2001
In-Reply-To:
<200108091601.MAA0000022025@torque.pothole.com>; from dee3@torque.pothole.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:01:57PM -0400
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Fields in DS record
Hi, Another vote for keep the algo and tag. If nothing else, Jakob has a good point about making it more human readable. The size should go. Dan On Thursday, August 09, 2001 at 12:01PM, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: | The way of computing the keytag is different for algoirthm 1... On the | other hand, that has theoretically been obsoleted... I'd keep both the | keytag and algorithm. | | Donald |