[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: DNSSEC <dnssec@cafax.se>
From: Dan Massey <masseyd@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:37:43 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivery-Date: Tue Aug 14 11:53:05 2001
In-Reply-To: <200108091601.MAA0000022025@torque.pothole.com>; from dee3@torque.pothole.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:01:57PM -0400
Sender: owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject: Re: Fields in DS record

Hi,

Another vote for keep the algo and tag.  If nothing else, Jakob
has a good point about making it more human readable.  
The size should go.

Dan

On Thursday, August 09, 2001 at 12:01PM, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
| The way of computing the keytag is different for algoirthm 1... On the
| other hand, that has theoretically been obsoleted...  I'd keep both the
| keytag and algorithm.
| 
| Donald
| 

Home | Date list | Subject list