To:
Jakob Schlyter <jakob@crt.se>
Cc:
Scott Rose <scottr@antd.nist.gov>, Wesley Griffin <wgriffin@tislabs.com>, DNSSEC <dnssec@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:20:52 -0400
Delivery-Date:
Tue Jul 10 09:39:15 2001
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSO.4.33.0107062251570.31219-100000@fonbella.crt.se>
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: SSH keys in DNS
At 4:59 PM -0400 7/6/01, Jakob Schlyter wrote: >I agree - based on discussion on this mailing-list, Ed Lewis has proposed >that we allocate a protocol value that bascially says 'the protocol is >encoded in the owner name'. this would typically lead us to a SRV type I just submitted the document to DNSEXT for inclusion in that WG. Part of the motivation for the said doc was the aversion to "subtyping" RR sets. I myself was unclear what that meant - mentioning it as a problem quoted elsewhere. Now I see a meaning - the subtyping issue relates to things like SSH version numbers. No matter how we subtype, one of the subtyped things may further divide the problem space. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial. Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.