To:
Scott Rose <scottr@antd.nist.gov>
Cc:
dnssec@cafax.se, DNSEXT WG Mailing list <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
From:
Miek Gieben <miekg@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:06:46 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<00ee01c103fe$1dc34ec0$b9370681@antd.nist.gov>; from scottr@antd.nist.gov on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:24:09PM -0400
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
User-Agent:
Mutt/Linux
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-00.txt
[On 03 Jul, 2001, Scott Rose wrote in " I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-00.txt "] > > If the group decides to use a bit to determine the opt-in status (I haven't > decided if I like the idea or not - right now I'm leaning towards "not" but > don't have a better solution yet) - let's pick an unused number to avoid any which zones are going to use opt-in? .com and .net? Can't we just say that we will never do DNSSEC on .com/.net and friends. If you want to be secure get your secure domainname under .secure? grtz Miek NLnet Labs