To:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Cc:
Miek Gieben <miekg@nlnetlabs.nl>, dnssec@cafax.se
From:
Miek Gieben <miekg@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date:
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:42:56 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
Delivery-Date:
Sat Jun 30 08:11:22 2001
In-Reply-To:
<200106281846.f5SIkWx27314@zed.isi.edu>; from bmanning@isi.edu on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:46:32AM -0700
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
User-Agent:
Mutt/Linux
Subject:
Re: ttl problems in DNSSEC
[On 28 Jun, 2001, Bill Manning wrote in " Re: ttl problems in DNSSEC "] > % What to do about this? Make the SHOULD a MUST in rfc2535? Or discard a > % KEY whenever you discard the SIG made with that KEY? > % > % regards, > % Miek Gieben > % Olaf Kolkman > % Stephan Jager > > I would discard the KEY w/ the SIG. as Roy says in his reply, you can still trust the KEY, If i see it correctly, implementing this would mean that KEYs don't really are cached.... maybe this is a good thing? grtz Miek