To:
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Cc:
dnssec@cafax.se
From:
Roy Arends <Roy.Arends@nominum.com>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:54:51 +0200 (CEST)
Delivery-Date:
Thu Jun 7 21:35:08 2001
In-Reply-To:
<5.1.0.14.0.20010531093041.02372d20@localhost>
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-delegation-signer-00.txt
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > Just in case anyone did not see this one, here are my .02 SKR solution to > the problem of keysets at apex. > Please read and comment as I would like do figure out real soon > if this is better or worse than Sigs at parent. > If there is no consensus on either this or Sigs at parent then sigs at > child wins. Just a small note here, I would prefer not to name this new resource record type "DK" as it might confuse with the ccTLD ".dk". I don't know whether the resource record type "MX" has ever confused with the ccTLD ".mx", but its just a thought. My .02 Euro. Regards Roy Arends Nominum