To:
ogud@ogud.com
Cc:
dnssec@cafax.se, sra@hactrn.net
From:
Havard Eidnes <he@runit.no>
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:29:31 +0200
Delivery-Date:
Thu Apr 26 21:53:55 2001
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:31:19 -0400"<5.1.0.14.0.20010425231408.04cf04f0@localhost>
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Keys at apex problem - New PUBKEY RR?
> > > >$origin east.isi.edu. > > > >@ IN SOA ... > > > >@ NS ... > > > >@ A 38.245.76.2 > > > >@ KEY <zone key> > > > >_ssh._tcp SRV 0 0 @ > > > >_ssh._tcp KEY <ssh host key material> > > > > > In this case the SRV record is redundant. Uhm, excuse me? It serves to move the SSH application KEY record away from the zone apex, which was otherwise the major sticking point with the original proposal, if I recall correctly? Regards, - Håvard