To:
Mark.Andrews@isc.org
CC:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:00:44 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<200311122307.hACN7USS002560@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject:
Re: well-known addresses / was DNS discovery
Mark.Andrews; > WKA adds yet one more set of addresses that need to be > filtered at the organisation's boundaries. No. Read the draft section 4.1. > Do you really > trust the your neighbors DNS servers to have the *same* > view of the world as you? Are you having a view that the Internet still consists of voluntury organizations directly connected? Read the draft section 4.1. > It is easy to accidently introduce single points of failure > into anycast solutions even though you have topologically > spread your nameservers. It much harder to do this with > a non-anycast solution. Anycast, just like multicast, itself is no robust. Read the draft section 4.1. > WKA doesn't remove the need to have another solution to > supply the search list. That is not a requirement. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.