To:
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
CC:
John Schnizlein <jschnizl@cisco.com>, Jaehoon Paul Jeong <paul@etri.re.kr>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:44:45 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0308070922000.19597-100000@netcore.fi> from PekkaSavola at "Aug 7, 2003 09:23:27 am"
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Policy of IPv6 DNS Discovery
Pekka Savola; > > > There are two cases here: > > > 1) "mobile hosts which use Mobile IP" > > > > > 2) "mobile hosts without Mobile IP" > > > > Don't try to misdirect the discussion. > > > As one of RA camp, I think, RA-approach is useful in some of wireless networks, > > > such as HMIPv6, MANET connected to the Internet and NEMO. > > > > That is the assumption here. > I'm not restricting myself to Jaehoon's assumptions Here, you are restricted by the context with which we are discussing, if you want to contribute to the discussion. > I'm just pointing out that when one says "mobile node", it > can mean at least a couple of different things. Do it elsewhere, not here. Here, in this thread at least, we already have an established terminology, defined by Jaehoon Paul Jeong, on mobility. Note also that the definition is well established in IETF that you should find somewhere outside of IETF. > > Worse, most of your reasonings are wrong and rest of them are too > > weak that any standardized way of DNS autoconfiguration is fine > > for your requirement. > > Please elaborate. Read recent mails of this WG to find the elaboration. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.