[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
CC: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:51:11 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To: <3F269EBE.7060300@ehsco.com> from "Eric A. Hall" at "Jul 29, 200311:20:14 am"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery

Eric A. Hall;

> I've submitted an I-D on this in particular, which is also available at
> http://www.ehsco.com/misc/draft-hall-resolver-config-00.txt

Your draft is excellent to say:
      
     This specification is intended to address the narrow scenario 
     where a host needs to determine the DNS servers which are willing 
     to provide DNS resolution services to that host. This document 
     does not define any additional services. 

Are there anyone who still have more bloated requirements?

> > It's also possible to limit the use of multicast to DNS discovery, such as
> > having clients issue (periodic) queries to the multicast address to
> > determine the available servers, and to choose the top 3 servers (or
> > whatever) based on certain criteria (RA flag, response time, whatever),
> > and then use unicast after that.

And if you specify all the details of protocol changes, the only
remaining problem is autoconfiguration of multicast.

							Masataka Ohta
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list