To:
"Masataka Ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc:
"Michael Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
"BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE" <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>
Date:
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:00:08 +0200
content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcNVd8fJAxLUL4/pQ7iND9+ogwCX8QAUK3ug
Thread-Topic:
proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery
Subject:
RE: proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery
But there was an explicit section that was concerning "Requirements" (section 2). Perhaps that section should be revised ? To my mind we still do not have a clear statement of what are the requirements. Some were presented by Rob Austein and Bob Hinden, but there has been nor a vote, neither a draft. Luc > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp] > Envoye : mardi 29 juillet 2003 04:08 > A : BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE > Cc : Michael Richardson; dnsop@cafax.se > Objet : Re: proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery > > > Luc; > > > There was a analysis made by the DNS Discovery Design Team > in march 2001 > > (draft-ietf-ipnwg-dns-discovery-01.txt). Wouldn't it be > valuable to go > > on or to restart such a work ? (instead of this no-end > battle?) I must > > have missed something concerning this old work. > > What has been missing is a clear definition on the requirement. > > Lacking it, IPv6 WG has been poorly managed that its past work > is not only useless but also harmful. > > Masataka Ohta > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.