To:
Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Cc:
DNSOP WG <dnsop@cafax.se>, Edward Warnicke <eaw@cisco.com>
From:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date:
Sat, 5 Jul 2003 17:03:34 -0700
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-warnicke-network-dns-resolution-02.txt
>> I'd have to check my notes to be certain, but I think that the WG >> discussed this in San Francisco and decided not to make it a WG doc. > not having been in San Francisco I do not know what the decision(oops?) > was based upon, but here are some comments and more detailed remarks > below: > ... > So, finally, based on the information currently available I'd agree that > the draft not be adopted by the WG. An update of RFC 1101 would be > interesting, though. <ad hat on> what i would most appreciate is one of o a statement by the wg that this is being taken on as a work item o a statement by the wg that this is NOT being taken on as a work item, but the wg has no problem with its publication as info o a statement by the wg that this should not be published for some stated set of reasons, or that it could be published but with a warning (text included). randy, just tryin' to process a document #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.