To:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
"Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
Date:
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:28:52 -0400
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: so how about that response size draft?
I am in favor of this draft becoming a working group item. At least that way it will be (hopefully) read and discussed. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Vixie" <paul@vix.com> To: <dnsop@cafax.se> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: so how about that response size draft? > akira and i both hoped that it would be adopted as a DNSOP work item > but the discussion of this in san francisco was inconclusive and there > has been no subsequent discussion here on the mailing list. > > a draft cutoff date looms. should this i-d have "-dnsop-" in its name? > > note that we also showed this draft to some of icann/iana's people and > they were happy to see it. therefore it may have some applicability to > somebody. should DNSOP "adopt" it and do the fold-spindle-mutilate thing? > > > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>. #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.