To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date:
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:54:56 +0200
In-reply-to:
Your message of "Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:29:00 +0200." <20030411082900.GA25683@dns.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt
Andras Salamon wrote: > This is a nice crisp way to summarise the draft. In an IN-ADDR context, > this is just a restatement of the usual `conservative in generation, > liberal in acceptance' credo of the IETF, so I don't think one can > disagree with it without also disagreeing with the basic principles of > the IETF. but it leads to these typical no-win situations in case of problems. If one end "relies" upon proper reverse mapping and the other end does not provide for it, would you think both are equally wrong? -Peter #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.