Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt

[Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>]

For the reasons just discussed under the subject titles

  Re: What problem were we trying to solve again? (was Re:
  Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doing reverse for IPv6,

this draft should be rejected.

However, if you want to continue discussing the topic of Reverse, I am
certainly willing.

		--Dean

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Måns Nilsson wrote:

> --On Monday, March 31, 2003 06:44:16 -0500 "Internet-Drafts@ietf.org"
> <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
> > Operations Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> > 	Title		: Requiring DNS IN-ADDR Mapping
> > 	Author(s)	: D. Senie
> > 	Filename	: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt
> > 	Pages		: 5
> > 	Date		: 2003-3-28
> >
> > Mapping of addresses to names has been a feature of DNS. Many sites,
> > implement it, many others don't. Some applications attempt to use it
> > as a part of a security strategy. The goal of this document is to
> > encourage proper deployment of address to name mappings, and provide
> > guidance for their use.
>
> This is a good draft. One thing might be desired, though:
>
> Inclusion of a v6 section, or, at least, mentioning of the fact that
> v6 deserves reverse, too. If, of course, we think it should be there.
>
> --
> Måns Nilsson            Systems Specialist
> +46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC  MN1334-RIPE
>
> We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.




#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.