To:
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B
<jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Date:
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:42:13 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0303240012320.4935-100000@netcore.fi>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Wanderlust/2.6.1 (Upside Down) Emacs/21.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject:
Re: dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-02
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:18:28 +0200 (EET), >>>>> Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> said: >> > Most traffic is not on the local link, rather connecting to service X over >> > the Internet. Node information queries are not useful except on the local >> > link. >> >> > Why not? One could consider why the mechanism is still "stuck" in the >> > IESG. I totally agree with not publishing ICMP NI as long as it can be >> > (ab)used to query off-link nodes. >> >> You are apparently saying that the reason for the NI spec being >> pending in the IESG queue is that it can be abused for off-link >> nodes. Is my understanding correct? If so, could you give me a >> pointer, please? I do not remember the exact reason, actually. > I think I saw something wrt. "applicability statement" in the I-D tracker, > but can't find it now. There seem to be something pending, check > IESG minutes from 2002-06-13. Okay, so please find a clear pointer before using such an unfair, misleading wording. Thanks, JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.