To:
itojun@iijlab.net
Cc:
Akira Kato <kato@wide.ad.jp>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:37:44 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<20030311041440.CB6284BF4@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: "local" zones
At 1:14 PM +0900 2003/03/11, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
>>While .local TLD has yet defined officially, there are substantial
>>queries to the Root DNS Servers as of writing. About 1/4 to 1/2% of the
>>traffic sent to the Root DNS Servers are related to the .local zone.
>>Therefore, while it is not formally defined, it is suggested that IANA
>>delegates .local TLD to an organization.
>
> i guess it's "about 1/4 to 1/2", not 0.5%.
Considering that .local is used with Rendezvous, multicast DNS,
etc..., this would probably be a good idea. Or maybe a bad idea, if
it causes things to break. Dunno. This needs more work.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.