To:
David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:20:31 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<BD4ED237-4759-11D7-B54C-000393DB42B2@nominum.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Why one port?
At 19:07 23/02/03, David Conrad wrote: >Jfc, >On Sunday, February 23, 2003, at 01:00 AM, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: >>>Where is the ID that describes DNS+ services so I can read it? >>It will be where we will have drafted it from the received inputs. > >This is pretty much exactly the opposite of the way things traditionally >work in the IETF. The idea behind IDs is they are submitted to prompt >input and discussion. I understand that. Seems very much as teaching the market before making a market study. Lack of pre-brainstorming. May explain all the post-braintearing? May be the reason why the DNS.2 still expected? Frankly, don't you think there are far more competent people than me on this list to write a draft on such a matter? However this topic belongs to the dot-root project and such a draft is foreseen on an information basis. But not before months, after the iterative specification mechanism I descirbed; and probably a few pre-testings. Also by a team including a better English writer that me :-). But I certainly want to share in it. Or may be would you want to discuss it privately and try to build a draft with a few other interested? My approach is user centered, list all what we want first. jfc #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.