[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: <dnsop@cafax.se>
From: Kandra Nygårds <kandra@foxette.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Why one port?

From: "Ed Sawicki" <ed@alcpress.com>

> I'm wondering why there is only one UDP port assigned to the DNS
> protocol? It prevents us from using both an iterative name
> server and a recursive name server/cache on the same computer
> when only one IP address is available.

Presumably so that clients would not have to guess what port to use.

It does make some sense in allowing a user-configurable port, but it makes
(IMHO) a lot more sense in sticking to a single DNS-port.

I have to wonder, why are you only able to use a single IP-address? Is it a
provider limitation? Get a real provider. OS limitation? Application
limitation? In either case, I'd recommend running the resolver on a separate
machine. If security is your concern, it makes even more sense, and you
don't have to rewrite the Internet to do it.


- Kandra



#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list