To:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Kandra Nygårds <kandra@foxette.net>
Date:
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Why one port?
From: "Ed Sawicki" <ed@alcpress.com> > I'm wondering why there is only one UDP port assigned to the DNS > protocol? It prevents us from using both an iterative name > server and a recursive name server/cache on the same computer > when only one IP address is available. Presumably so that clients would not have to guess what port to use. It does make some sense in allowing a user-configurable port, but it makes (IMHO) a lot more sense in sticking to a single DNS-port. I have to wonder, why are you only able to use a single IP-address? Is it a provider limitation? Get a real provider. OS limitation? Application limitation? In either case, I'd recommend running the resolver on a separate machine. If security is your concern, it makes even more sense, and you don't have to rewrite the Internet to do it. - Kandra #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.