[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@sunet.se>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:08:59 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021014105333.GA8679@nic.fr>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: the call for bind software

--On Monday, October 14, 2002 12:53:33 +0200 Stephane Bortzmeyer
<bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> Postfix does it for a long time (scanning interfaces to see who's
> allowed to relay but allowing you to override its discoveries) and it
> seems all Postfix administrators are happy with it.

Postfix is much younger than BIND. Using Postfix is something you actively
choose. That is quite different from the legacy carried by named. Besides,
most nameserver implementations do allow queries from anywhere, so altering
that would not only change the default behaviour, it would challenge the de
facto standard.  

Shouldn't this be discussed on a bind9 mailing list instead? 
-- 
Måns Nilsson            Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC  MN1334-RIPE

We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscripbe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list