To:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
cc:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, Ed Sawicki <ed@alcpress.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, dnsop@cafax.se, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:37:03 +0200
In-reply-to:
Your message of Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:23:50 +0200. <a05111b03b95ae691817d@[10.0.1.60]>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Re: RFC 1886 Interop Tests & Results
In your previous mail you wrote: Moreover, this test should be labelled a "Standards Conformance Test" or "Standards Compliance Test", and not an "Interoperability Test", because the latter can be construed to be discussing "products" as opposed to pre-alpha testing mules. => I don't know if there is a difference between a "Standards Conformance Test" and a "Standards Compliance Test" but there is a large one between a "Standards Conformance Test" and an "Interoperability Test". And this test is clearly in the second category, so the label is correct. Regards Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr PS: I can give a contact in one of the four IPv6 test groups I know if you need details, pointers to standards, etc. BTW one of these groups participated to this test...