Re: spurious updates

[Simon Coffey <sicoffey@yahoo.com>]

Bruce Campbell wrote:

>urm, Randy is complaining about dynamic IP addresses from Hosts *outside*
>his administrative control.  The problem is not with the psg end, but with
>the sites that are referencing psg in some-to-be-determined manner.
>
>If everyone did use a good naming schemes, we'd be happy.  If we, as
>nameserver operators who get unwanted dynamic updates, were able to point
>people at some sort of naming standard and say 'Fix it', we'd be happier.
>
>The classic example of organisations making up their own standards and not
>referencing others, is Microsoft's suggestion of 'Use "INT" for your
>Internal naming structures'.  The nameservers for 'int.' thus get a nice
>loading of dynamic updates.
>
>Regards,
>
Sorry, didnt figure that Randy *is* looking after psg.  As you say, my 
finger should be pointing at "some other guy" using psg in their domain, 
or borrowing psg's address range.

What I'd proposed in a draft was to reserve "pri." for internal 
networks, and then the "int." servers get a break, and everyones happy 
as we never have "pri." nameservers.

Anyway, I'll let you get back to the original discussion!

cheers
Simon Coffey


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com