To:
Régis Desmeules <Regis.Desmeules@viagenie.qc.ca>
cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:21:09 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To:
<5.0.0.25.2.20020123085515.024ef280@localhost>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-dontpublish-unreachable-02.txt
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Régis Desmeules wrote: > >I did intend the general principles stated in the document to be > >applicable to both IPv4 and IPv6. But as I'm not an expert in IPv6, > > It's another good point, for many people IPv6 is a new protocol > meaning other basic topics like representations of IPv6 addresses > should be also considered. I don't myself think that this is the right place to go into detail like that. Representations of IPv6 addresses are applicable in many situations, and ought to be covered independently in a more "obvious" place. IMHO, of course. > If you're interested, I can write as co-author with you the IPv6 > considerations part of the proposed draft. I will wait a few more days to see if further comments come in, and then I will update my draft to include Itojun's suggested points, and then publish a new draft for everybody to consider. Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.