To:
<itojun@iijlab.net>
cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Date:
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:34:04 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To:
<21148.1011772636@itojun.org>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-dontpublish-unreachable-02.txt
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 itojun@iijlab.net wrote: > hello, i guess the document should be updated to either: > - cover IPv6 addresses as well, as IPv6 scoped addresses share > the same problem as IPv4 private addresses I did intend the general principles stated in the document to be applicable to both IPv4 and IPv6. But as I'm not an expert in IPv6, I didn't put in any specific considerations. There is in fact only one reference to IPv6: The loopback addresses (127.0.0.1 for IPv4 and ::1 for IPv6) are... > a very rough draft for IPv6 counterpart is attached. please let me > know if you want to integrate two it one, or want to handle them > separately. If other people on this list think it is a good idea, I will be happy to take your draft and integrate it a new section entitled "IPv6 considerations". What do people think? Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.