To:
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
Cc:
"Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>, "Nathan Jones" <nathanj@optimo.com.au>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Johan Ihren <johani@autonomica.se>
Date:
15 Aug 2001 13:27:07 +0200
In-Reply-To:
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino's message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:08:52 +0900"
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) Emacs/20.3
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net> writes: > >> >I'm pointing out that due to the configuration change that will follow > >> >from deployment of v6 roots it will be comparatively easy to reach all > >> >the caching resolvers (i.e. name servers) on v6 transport to ensure > >> >that they all do AAAA synthesis. > >> isn't it just a root.hint change, not a server replacement? > >Well, if you are running in a forwarding configuration *with your > >present server* and replace the root.hint file with one that includes > >v6 glue for one or several roots not much will happen. So there is no > >point to it. > > > >Because you are using a forwarding configuration. > > I don't understand what you are saying, AT ALL. I'm not using > forwarding configuration. you must have some assumption in > your head which is not presented here. Ok. Before I repeat the mistake of guessing at your configuration I suggest you tell me about it. Personally I use a forwarding config for v6-only nameservers and I believe that this is by far the most common case. Johan