Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary

[Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>]

% Hogwash.
	Actually, the correct response here is "Sheep Dip" :)

%   | 	we can do the following:
%   | 
%   | 	a) move one proposal somewhere else on the standards track
% 
% You actually mean off the standards track.

	Well, we could do that too.  ISIS/OSPF ended up spending
	-lots- of time at different places on the stds track.
	For the AAAA/A6 debate that is tabled, I'd rather see
	one moved off the stds track to experimental.

%   | 	Because I beleive that A6 has enough potential, I'm willing 
%   | 	to have it move to experimental, giving developers and
%   | 	operators more time to understand its impact.  I think that
%   | 	long term, its benefits will overshadow AAAA and that a
%   | 	migration plan can be deployed.
% 
% No, assuming you're right, long term what will happen is that people
% will lament that the wrong decision was made in 2001, but regret that
% there's no way to transition any more, the combination of resolvers
% doing only AAAA lookups, and servers providing only AAAA records, means
% there's no clean way to get out from under (sure, servers could provide
% A6 records as well, but they'll have to keep providing AAAA records
% forever to keep the old resolvers happy, and resolvers could do A6 lookups
% but they'd have to fall back on doing AAAA so they can find names that
% are only available that way - given that AAAA would have to remain, and
% resolvers would have to do lookups of it, just for practical reasons,
% there's no way to actually transition to A6).

	Cynic. (nee realist?)

% 
% kre
% 


-- 
--bill