To:
ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
Date:
20 Jul 2001 06:44:50 -0000
Automatic-Legal-Notices:
Copyright 2001, D. J. Bernstein. My transmission of this message to you does not constitute a copyright waiver or any other limitation of my rights, even if you have told me otherwise.
Content-Disposition:
inline
Subject:
Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation
1. I won't be at the meeting. However, I strongly support elimination of A6/DNAME: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html 2. There's a common error in the evaluation of DNSSEC signing costs. I'd like to draw attention to a new section that I've added to my web page to analyze this error: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html#signingcosts 3. I don't understand why this is an ngtrans issue rather than an ipngwg issue. The question is not how to move smoothly to A6/DNAME; the question is whether we want A6/DNAME at all. ---Dan