To:
"Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, "Lars-Johan Liman" <liman@autonomica.se>
Cc:
"pdeblanc@usvi. net" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>, "@Quasar" <shore@quasar.net>, "orobles@nic. mx" <orobles@nic.mx>, "Elisabeth. Porteneuve@cetp. ipsl. fr" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, "edyson@edventure. com" <edyson@edventure.com>, "Eric. Menge@sba. gov" <Eric.Menge@sba.gov>, "JandL" <jandl@jandl.com>, "Jay@Fenello. com" <Jay@Fenello.com>, <Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.com>, "joppenheimer@icbtollfree. com" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, "krose@ntia. doc. gov" <krose@ntia.doc.gov>, "mcade@att. com" <mcade@att.com>, "mueller@syr. edu" <mueller@syr.edu>, "vint cerf" <vcerf@MCI.NET>, "pindar@HK. Super. NET" <pindar@HK.Super.NET>, "linda@icann. org" <linda@icann.org>, "karl@cavebear. com" <karl@cavebear.com>, "quaynor@ghana. com" <quaynor@ghana.com>, "junsec@wide. ad. jp" <junsec@wide.ad.jp>, "andy@ccc. de" <andy@ccc.de>, "shkyong@kgsm. kaist. ac. kr" <shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr>, "hans@icann. org" <hans@icann.org>, "mkatoh@mkatoh. net" <mkatoh@mkatoh.net>, "ken. fockler@sympatico. ca" <ken.fockler@sympatico.ca>, "f. fitzsimmons@att. net" <f.fitzsimmons@att.net>, "Amadeu@nominalia. com" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>, <Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at>, <smlee@i-names.co.kr>, <Sabine.Jaume@renater.fr>, <rbeca@ctc.cl>, "mouhamet@sonatel. sn" <mouhamet@sonatel.sn>, "jplano@quorum. com. ar" <jplano@quorum.com.ar>, <jianping@sea.net.edu.cn>, "hph@online. no" <hph@online.no>, "gvaldez@nic. mx" <gvaldez@nic.mx>, "cjw@remarque. org" <cjw@remarque.org>, <barbara@gblx.net>, <arano@byd.ocn.ad.jp>, "ant@hivemind. net" <ant@hivemind.net>, <glaser@fapesp.br>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
"JIM R FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>
Date:
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:13:02 -0500
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
"the requirement for unique hierarchy administration"
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> To: "Lars-Johan Liman" <liman@autonomica.se> Cc: <dnsop@cafax.se> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:08 AM Subject: Re: London issues. > At 06:49 PM 6/27/2001, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: > >Could I please have a "show of hands" of which of the document > >... > >The following documents are on the stage (Ohta-san's have expired): > > > This is about a document NOT on your list. That might mean it is not > possible to consider it at this time. Further, it might be assessed as out > of scope for the group. > > In case there is flexibility, I'll raise the question, but fully understand > that the it might be deferred: > > This working group seems to me the best IETF venue for discussing questions > that have been raised about administering unique hierarchies. The IAB > wrote a document concerning the requirement for a unique DNS root. I have > expanded on their document, considering concerns that were raised after > their document was issued, and broadening the scope, as discussion some has > generally challenged the requirement for unique hierarchy administration. > > The I-D > is: <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-unique-assign-01.txt>. > > I am seeking comments on the draft and hope that we can advance it to BCP. > > d/ > > ---------- > Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com> > Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> > tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464 > Can we assume this only applies to the "toy" IPv4 Internet ? ....as opposed to "production services".... When one talks about "production services", I assume they are at a minimum talking about IPv16-Compliant equipment. (i.e. Carrier-Grade, NEBS, 24", -48vDC,Fault-Tolerant LANs,1000/100/10 Ethernets) http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv16/ Jim Fleming Why gamble with a .BIZ Lottery? Start a real .BIZ Today ! http://www.DOT-BIZ.com http://www.BIZ.Registry 0:212 - BIZ World