To:
<namedroppers@local.reachin.com>
cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>, <registry@OBOL-NET.NET>
From:
Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>
Date:
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:07:58 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.30.0104031113370.26824-100000@artemas.reachin.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Strange behavior from resolvers?
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 namedroppers@local.reachin.com wrote:
>
> > The ns1.obol-net.net is certainly not running bind, so the question
> > remains which nameserver is doing wrong. As far as I can see, bind would
> > return SOA in auhority section for an equevalent request.
>
> I believe the DNS server they are running is Novell's DNS server. I know
> that their web server is running "NetWare-Enterprise-Web-Server/5.1".
Yes, we have been informed that the the servers, ns{1,2}.obol-net.net are
running Novell 5.0 and 5.1, respectively (or the other way around).
> As Eric has just pointed out (as I was writing this), this tells BIND (and
> DJBDNS) "I do not have this answer, but the answer can be found at my
> nameserver".
I tested a server which I think is an NT (non-bind) server, which permits
recursion. It accepts the respons from the Novell server without SERVFAIL:
; <<>> DiG 2.2 <<>> @ns1.ballou.se ns1.obol-net.net mx
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10
;; flags: qr aa ra; Ques: 1, Ans: 0, Auth: 2, Addit: 2
;; QUESTIONS:
;; ns1.obol-net.net, type = MX, class = IN
;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
obol-net.net. 86400 NS ns2.obol-net.net.
obol-net.net. 86400 NS ns1.obol-net.net.
Mats
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg +46-8-545 857 06
dufberg@nic-se.se fax: +46-8-545 857 29